Why John is such a twat / 12 Years a (Math) Slave
I don't enjoy doing math
but math just seems to love doing me...
I get that numbers may be a tool of some world without
sentiment, that one imperfection in the human make-up
that means we grief over love and life lost.
It should make things easier.
But really, Math, though:
Teach us to divide but then tell us we are more than a sum of our parts;
that we are more than uniformed hypotheses to be tested and
tested on; maybe we should let you convince us that
equality only exists in equations, that integration requires differentiation
but race, class, and borders do anything but unite.
Come on, who honestly cares about the number of ways "John" can sit
at a table of people without sitting next to those dressed in blue?
If John wasn't such a twat he'd sit with people regardless of colour and
save us all that trouble. But John is a twat after all.
Now, calculate the distance from A to B,
or S
or U
or you from me;
give us a figure to figure out and hinge our self worth upon
- who doesn't like another number
to remind me them how much they suck at numbers?
I once interviewed a maths prodigy; took us three tries
to finally meet - my very own 三顾茅庐 tale. Told me his
love for math stems from its freedom from language, culture,
politics - all of which complicate the real world - as well as its,
and I quote, "
completely logical and systematic nature".
Gödel too believed mathematical truths to be self-evident,
but if that's the case, why does it all read like Greek to me?
Whatever happened to those who live
between the whats and ifs and buts and maybes,
not the Xs and Ys and Zs and GCs; tell us
Orion wouldn't have a belt if it were not for geometry,
and that we are all here in constellations,
in perfect equations, in little sequences and series that
make it seem as though everything happens in the same, deductible way;
as though everything can and must be explained...
But maybe there was a Jackson Pollock of the universe,
splattered the stars across the sky in some
sweeping act of rambunctious artistry, laid them bare in
nude nirvana; You see, not everything subscribes to your formulas;
which, you may say, is an art, and yet I'm pretty sure that
only things of the he
art have art in them.
Even then, can your math - your fashionably flawless,
wonderfully water-tight math - explain how it is
that this was written in math class,
that the stars were written in math,
that all
this was written in the stars?
That if we had to one day tell the story of the stars
we'd just speak of shapes and patterns
- not of hoping, coping, losing, then finding,
nor the weight of things that were and will be, but
just specks of significance, 3 s.f. and shit like that,
dots on lines on maps, finding their way around this place
without coordinates to the heart, or a compass pointing to okay,
forever thinking we had made sense of the world,
living the illusion that our trip around the Sun
was always a perfect circle.
--
This is an accumulation of lines from over a few months that I've only just managed to mash together very poorly but more importantly - an utterly relatable moment from one of my favourite shows: 0:21.